 |
 |
 |
|
Panorama
Dr.
S. Natesh
Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India
(natesh.dbt@nic.in)
The
Indian biotechnology sector is projected to cross the US
$ 2 billion mark during 2006-07. Although this answers for
only a little more than 1% share of the global biotech pie,
the encouraging sign is that the sector is riding on a healthy
growth rate of over 35% annually over the last five years.
The prognosis is good and consensus among industry leaders
and policy makers is that, with proper fiscal and policy
initiatives, the sector could easily scale the US $ 25 billion
figure by 2015
There are today about 300 biotech companies in India
with the top 10 accounting for 50% of the revenue
generated, and R&D investment of the top five
exceeding US $ 300 million. Geographically, the biotech
companies have developed in three major clusters across
the country. The largest in terms of revenue generated
is the western cluster (Ahmedabad, Aurangabad, Mumbai
and Pune), followed by the southern cluster (Bangalore,
Chennai and Hyderabad) and the northern cluster (Delhi,
Gurgaon and Noida). Exports stood at Rs 2,001 crores
and contributed to 42.17% of the total business with
bio-pharma products currently contributing to 73.15%
of the exports. Domestic business accounted for Rs
2,744 crores. The key opportunity segments are: bio-pharmaceutical
(vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics) bio-agri (transgenics,
biofertilizers, biopesticides) bio-industry, bio-informatics
and bio-services (R&D, clinical trials, and manufacturing
on contract). The bio-agri segment registered the
highest growth rate during the year at 154%, followed
by bio-services (54.6%), bio-industry (34.55%), bio-pharma
(30%) and bio-informatics (25%). |
|
 |
Several
factors have contributed to the current upbeat feeling
about India's biotech sector. Among the strengths
we can count are our wealth of biodiversity; a sizeable
English-speaking scientific workforc, robust IT base,
reasonably good infrastructure network, well-positioned
pharma industry, strong MNC presence, and a large,
diverse, therapy-naïve population with varying
gene pool.
The Government, both at the centre
and in the states, has provided several fiscal and
other incentives to the sector in terms of tax holidays,
capital subsidies, creation of biotech parks, special
economic zones, incubators etc. Besides the Department
of Biotechnology (DBT), which is the major supporter
of R&D related to biotechnology, the Department
of Science & Technology |
(DST),
Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR),
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), and Indian
Council of Medical Research (ICMR), all fund public sector
research in life sciences and biotechnology Private firms
can approach DST's Technology Development Board (http://www.tdbindia.org/),
which offers soft loans with minimum interest, DBT's Small
Business Innovation Research Initiative (http://dbtindia.nic.in/SBIRI/SIBRI_main-F.html),
which funds early/late stage research, or CSIR's New Millennium
Indian Technology Leadership Initiative program (http://www.csir.res.in/csir/external/heads/collaborations/NM.pdf)
that was set up to boost public-private partnerships. India's
IPR regime has become fully TRIPS compliant to promote innovation.
A single-window biotech regulatory authority is on the anvil
to ensure a science-based efficient process.
Indian biotech companies have not only been resourceful
in leveraging various financing opportunities from both
domestic and international sources but also proactive in
establishing and maintaining collaborations and partnerships
in India and abroad. They have also aimed to become competitive
by patenting products and technologies on a global basis.
However, much still needs to be done if India is to assume
its rightful role in the global bioeconomy. The draft National
Biotechnology Development Strategy (prepared by DBT after
nearly two years of consultations with all stakeholders)
has identified a number of issues that require urgent attention
in the quest to create a favorable and enabling environment
for enterprise creation and private sector development.
Some of the issues that need to be urgently translated into
policies and actions are: a) creating a pool of technologically
skilled human resource in adequate numbers; b) capacity
building in areas such as IPR management, technology transfer
and clinical trials etc.; c) creating institutions with
a new ethos for seamless conversion of knowledge into products
and processes; d) greater support to industry, specially
small and medium sector enterprises; e) putting in place
a world class regulatory system and ensuring adequate training
for regulatory personnel.
In short, we need to build a culture of innovation and enterprise
from the bottom up with complementary help from top down.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|